INF, or "Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty", was originally signed by Russia and the United States in 1987. The treaty aims to dismantle a whole class of nuclear and non-nuclear weapons; ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with a range between 500 and 5,500 kilometers. In the end, both the United States and the Soviet Union dismantled 2,692 ground-operated ballistic missiles.
About 23 years later, in 2014, the United States allegedly held Russia responsible for its violation of the treaty’s “not owning, producing, or flying test... and not producing ground-based missile launchers” clauses. After repeated accusations, by February 19, President Trump decided to withdraw from the treaty for two main reasons: Russia’s non-compliance with the treaty and the threat from China’s growing arsenal of medium-range missiles. In response, Russia also withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty.
China's response to U.S. withdrawal
The United States immediately tried to expand the agreement by including China in the treaty and restricting its growing ballistic missile arsenal. At the same time, China opposed the United States’ intention to withdraw and extend the agreement. A spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that "it is completely wrong to put the issue of withdrawal from the treaty outside of China."
It should be remembered that China has developed a huge arsenal of more than 2,000 surface-launched ballistic missiles since the mid-1990s, especially to counter US military strategies when regional conflicts break out and the US attempts to intervene, such as Taiwan or its presence in the East China Sea. Territorial conflict with any island in the South China Sea. China believes that the withdrawal of the United States from the treaty poses a threat to regional and strategic stability, because the United States will now have a more aggressive nuclear policy. It can now be expected that the United States will deploy land-based ballistic missiles in East Asia. Fortunately, the Intermediate-Range-Range Treaty bans these missiles.
Policy impact on China
After the United States withdraws from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, China should work hard to strengthen its alliance with East Asian countries, especially Japan and South Korea. Because it can be well predicted that Japan, as an ally of the United States, will be pressured to allow the United States to deploy missiles at its bases to deter China. Such alliances can only conduct a diplomatic counterattack on the basis of common interests. The ultimate goal should be to prevent the United States from interfering in Asia.
In addition, foreign policy decisions should be transparent, because the large number of missiles that can be equipped with conventional and nuclear explosives may raise suspicions and increase the risk of escalation of military conflicts.
China can respond to this withdrawal by upgrading its military capabilities; ensuring the survivability of its nuclear weapons, achieving command and control of modern intercontinental ballistic missiles, introducing MIRV, and building and deploying advanced nuclear submarines. In addition, China can also indulge in cyber weapons to suppress US command, communications, and control systems.
China must now start working hard to effectively and efficiently develop its nuclear trinity. As its SSBN, ballistic missile submarines have no competition with the United States.
China has become a regional hegemon through its hard power and soft power. Now expanding economic ties and investing in foreign trade is more in its best interest than expanding its military arsenal, because China already has enough military capabilities to deter the United States. Furthermore, the withdrawal of the United States from INF is only an increase in the number of missiles, not an increase in quality, because the United States has deployed sea-to-air missiles in Asia, which are of course more effective than ground-based missiles.
By providing trade incentives to Japan and South Korea, China is also likely to persuade them diplomatically not to allow the United States to enter their strategic bases. Japan has opposed the withdrawal of the United States from the treaty, and according to Japanese tradition, local governments have a say in the foreign decision-making process, of course, through public consent. It should be noted that the public sentiment in Japan is against the United States' withdrawal from the treaty. The United States deploys missiles to Japanese territory.
As far as South Korea is concerned, due to the US deployment of the THAAD system to North Korea, it has already faced China's economic and diplomatic sanctions of approximately US$7 billion. Now it does not want the US to enter its strategic base again, this time directly targeting China.
It can be said that the U.S. withdrawal from the treaty is biased. Its plan to deploy land-based cruise missiles in Asia is provocative. This will definitely disrupt the balance in the region and lead to military confrontations between the United States and China. This may be a major escalation. Opportunities will certainly trigger an arms race.
To conduct diplomatic negotiations on these issues and propose an extended version of the Intermediate-Range-Range Treaty to promote a better cause of arms control and ultimate disarmament will be more in line with the interests of the superpowers.
Bangladesh-France Defense Cooperation in the New Era of Geopolitics
Critical assessment of Pakistan's second-strike capability
Syeda Aaminah Hamid is a strategic and nuclear research student at the National Defense University. She is very interested in geopolitics and foreign policy.
Some truths about the East Pakistan War in 1971
Playing cat and mouse: UAE energy company agrees to build power plant in Iran
Political corruption in the U.S., Germany, and Russia
Franco-German unity is the pivot to sovereign Europe
American Democracy Summit
India and Pakistan: leaders then and now
"After the June 30th revolution, in the face of U.S. policies and interference in our internal affairs, the nationalist sentiments of the Egyptian people and the sentiments of the eastward advancement of China and Russia rose among the Egyptian people." The increase in pressure may be an opportunity to prove our existence with our allies in the East (such as China and Russia). Through my analysis of the impact of the Democratic Conference of the United States of America, and the failure of Egypt and the countries in the region to invite it to join the relationship between the United States and Israel, Egypt and the Gulf, in the growing influence of China and Russia, we will find the following:
With China's growing interest in crossing the Suez Canal, China has invested billions of dollars in Egypt. Chinese companies are helping in the desert on the outskirts of Cairo (building Egypt’s new administrative capital), and developing ports and the Ain Sukhna industrial zone in the Red Sea. Therefore, China will benefit from the state of anger over the U.S. policy in Egypt and the region, and strengthen cooperation by injecting more Chinese investment into Egypt and countries in the region. This will threaten the United States’ own interests by (dividing the entire region). For Israel as an oasis of American democracy, in exchange for the Sino-Russian polarization of all Middle Eastern countries).
Here, we find the importance of the Egyptian President (Abdul-Fattah Sisi) turning to Eastern power, namely (China and Russia), and the analysis of his visits to Beijing at least six times since he took office in 2014, compared to (Visiting Washington only twice). Here, it must be kept in mind that (some leaders in the Middle East and the Persian Gulf itself may think that China is very suitable for dominating their region), like Israel, is composed of countries (they have the same views as China) national sovereignty, non-interference and human rights ).
This may have become an "opportunity to restore the military balance between Egypt and Israel by arming the Egyptian army with new Russian or Chinese weapons, rather than an American army that is keen to maintain Israel's quality and strategic superiority." Others think this is "first of all," It has to do with gaining support from China’s economy and internationally, enabling Egypt to resume its role and get rid of the political constraints of domination and political conditions.”
In order to understand the real purpose of the conference of democratic countries in the United States of America at this time, and the secret of the United States' insistence on fighting against Cairo, the Arabian Gulf and the Middle East countries, not inviting all countries to the tables of democratic countries around the world, perhaps the result of doing so will be ( Efforts to resume cooperation with the Russian bear and the Chinese dragon), and what China can mainly provide to Egypt in view of the economic difficulties. In the post-Covid-19 world, it is reported that it is nothing more than (the United States tries to put pressure on everyone), And it reveals the fact that there are problems with the United States’ diplomacy in the country, breaking its reputation and supporting China and its development projects in the region.
In this context, "President Sisi’s view" is: "The biggest political mistake of the past was to "put the eggs in one basket", that is, only woo the United States, the White House and the Western world. President Sisi believes that, "Cairo must deal with every global power so that it does not depend on one or the other geopolitical axis."
The first implementation of the President’s “Sisi Strategy” is (trying to cooperate with China, Russia and other emerging powers on the cultural, social, political and military levels), as well as the prospects for economic and investment cooperation. This is the most important aspect of Egypt. factor.
Therefore, the most important thing that has attracted my attention recently is the "reconciliation and communication between China and Egypt and Arab parties." And here (China is willing to cooperate with all political parties in Egypt and Arab countries to fight against new opposition groups, various forms of political forces, and oppose interference in other countries' internal affairs in the name of human rights). This is of course welcomed by Egypt and all other big countries in the region.
On the other hand, (China and its Russian allies are trying to benefit from the state of mobilization in Egypt and Middle Eastern countries, popular and official anger, and their sensitivity to excluding them from participating in the U.S. Democracy Conference) through more cooperation with all countries in the region. Reconciliation and policy coordination. In view of Egypt’s position in the Arab world and Africa, Egypt is one of the first candidates for further reconciliation with China and Russia to promote bilateral and collective cooperation in the field (Arab, Islam and Africa) and support China’s “One Belt, One Road” initiative in one way. "project.
As the current state of chaos in the United States persists, and (the United States insists on confronting Egypt, the Arabian Gulf and other countries in the region because they failed to invite the American Democracy Conference), from here on, this has had a negative impact on the U.S. government. This The U.S. should be worried, especially because (China can use it to enter all Egyptian ports and ports of Middle Eastern countries, and begin to implement alliance policies and mobilize similar to the current U.S. game), which will improve China’s position in the Middle East, of course. There is Russia. Due to the current popular and political anger, China and Russia are more likely to harm Washington’s interests.
Both China and Russia will try (using the US vacuum in the region, especially the opportunity of the US opposition in the region, to gather more intelligence information about US interests, similar to Washington’s concerns about Israel’s Haifa Port), which will threaten To the influence and presence of the entire United States in all fields. Countries in the region, in view of the continued existence of errors and methods in US policy against all countries in the region.
It should also (assess other potential security issues caused by the United States of America not inviting Egypt and Middle Eastern countries to participate in the Democratic National Conference), so that they oppose it and endanger the interests of the United States, including: China and Russia against Egypt and the United States in the region The arms sales to the countries it sells may be used by China and Russia to have the opportunity to show their advanced technology in front of the United States in order to activate the so-called: (Facing Washington’s counterintelligence).
In the long run, the most dangerous is still (China and Russia establish military bases in the eastern Mediterranean or Suez, with war machines or Chinese and Russian troops to control the flow of goods, people, and global trade. Washington). Perhaps the hostility of the United States towards Egypt and countries in the region is that China and Russia complete their long-term plans to help hinder the interests of the United States and threaten the interests of the United States in the Middle East.
From here, we draw an important analysis. The United States insists on dividing the region and the world, holding democratic conferences and excluding countries in the region, and adopting (ignite competition and the global polarization between the growing powers led by China and Russia). Polarization), facing alliances, polarization, and the politics of mobilization by the United States in the region and around the world.
South Asia has not been stable for a long time. Since British colonial rule, it has been flooded with religious, ethnic, territorial or nuclear conflicts. The region has compromised with 8 countries: India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Bhutan, Nepal, and Maldives; some scholars have also conflated Iran and Myanmar, but this is not a popular view. The history of the region is turbulent, mainly because it is home to two nuclear powers, India and Pakistan, which have been fighting since the day they were born. South Asia is also a neighboring country of Russia and China, the two major powers in the world. The turbulent relations between Russia and China and the superpower of the United States have played a direct role in the destruction of regional peace. South Africa’s regional hegemon is India. However, due to its hostile rhetoric and refusal to participate in negotiations on pressing issues such as Kashmir, Aksai Chin, and Alenchal, it seems to be supporting its isolationist stance.
"Is it easy to denuclearize?" For decades, this question has plagued heads of state, policymakers and scholars. What is the tipping point for the worst and most radical steps a country can take?
India is currently regarded as a regional superpower, but as Asia’s own power dynamics change, it seems to be losing control of the reins. The slow but sure transition from military and hard power to economic and soft power is parallel to the transition from India-centered Asia to China-centered Asia. For those who see it as India’s imminent fuse, this is a worrying movement that could lead the country to adopt harsh, impulsive and nuclear measures with endless consequences for the entire region.
The alliance that will define power dynamics to be established in the region no longer has India’s major participation. Two of the main examples are the “Belt and Road Initiative” (BRI)[1] and the security golden ring.
The "One Belt, One Road" initiative is the main reason why the coming century is called the "Chinese Era" or "Asian Century". Its influence is global, and its application is not just a utopian daydream. It has affected two-thirds of the world's population with its far-reaching model, and has brought huge profits to East Asia and Southeast Asia. In the first five years, the “One Belt One Road” initiative has brought about US$500 billion to Southeast Asian countries such as Malaysia, Cambodia, Indonesia, Singapore, and Vietnam (Freeman and Freeman, 2019).
The G7 countries have put forward the “Rebuild a Better World” (B3W) initiative to counter China’s influence and rebuild the Western influence that Chinese activities have been declining. Unsurprisingly, India fully supports this position and was even invited by the United Kingdom to participate in the 47th G7 Summit as a guest. [2] However, although B3W hopes to provide economic relief to low- and middle-income countries that are struggling due to the pandemic, China’s initiative hopes to form a sustainable economic integration plan that will enable states to work without strings attached. Handouts or veritable charities. India's support for B3W stems from the fear of China's conquest of all three territorial power channels, Heartland (John McKinder), Rimland (Spykman) and Haiquan (Mahan).
The security golden circle is accompanied by a series of concerns about the declining regional hegemony. Its signatories include Russia, China, Iran, Pakistan and Turkey. The purpose of the alliance is to stabilize the turmoil in Afghanistan and relations in the region. The agreement poses a hidden threat to India because it not only demonstrates regional cohesion without India’s participation, but also provides Pakistan with another platform that can strengthen ties with major powers in the current political climate.
De Gaulle said, "Nuclear weapons often make alliances obsolete." In this context, we analyzed the importance of nuclear weapons to a country that has deviated from isolationism. Its two main competitors, Pakistan and China, not only have the same level of nuclear capabilities, but also have the upper hand in many alliances. This confirms the global support to a certain extent.
No matter how powerful or effective the incentives are, the use of nuclear weapons will bring about a series of consequences, which can only be avoided if you are a superpower.
India’s geo-strategic location and its proximity to the two countries most likely to be the target of its nuclear warheads greatly reduces the chance of a nuclear attack. There is not only the risk of harm to oneself, but also the risk of harm to the local people. Attacks on any of these neighboring countries will result in a military response from both sides. Therefore, any damage caused by India's plan will be rewarded to its own people. Such destruction will include destruction centered on people and the country. For human-centered [3], only the “air explosion effect” can cause enough damage like conventional weapons. Thermal radiation can cause fires, and sediments (soil mixed with fissile materials) will be scattered on the ground, making It will be useless in the next few years.
The second is the deterrence concept and nuclear strike policy of Pakistan and China. Pakistan has repeatedly refused to occupy the status of "no first use" and remains ambiguous, which means that if India hints at aggression, it is ready to retaliate on a large scale [4]. Pakistan’s main position is deterrence. If deterrence fails, India will be annihilated.
On the other hand, China has always pursued a "no first use" policy, stating that its position is defensive. It first appeared to be an attempt to prevent the attack. In fact, it actually worked for India because of the scars left by the conventional war that India lost to China in 1962.
Then there is the fact that China is about to become a superpower allied with Pakistan and will fully support it against India, not only because of “friendly relations”, but also because of China’s interests in the collapse or division of India. India is now It has replaced Pakistan's US pipelines and puppets in South Asia.
As discussed above, India is isolated, which means that it needs all global recognition and support, especially if it is determined to consolidate its position on China and the “Belt and Road” initiative. However, if it conducts a nuclear strike, global backlash, sanctions, and general dissatisfaction with it are enough to overshadow any hopes India has in regional affairs, let alone global affairs. India is unlikely to take this drastic measure and jeopardize its position in the international system.
[1] Christoph Nedopir Wang. 2021. "One Belt One Road Initiative (BRI) Countries-Green Finance and Development Centers".
[2] ("The Prime Minister's Participation in the 47th G7 Summit" 2013)
[3] The Impact of Nuclear Penetration of the Earth and Other Weapons 2005, Chapter 6 Human and Environmental Impact
[4] Sadia Taslim. 2016. "Pakistan's Nuclear Use Principles". Carnegie Foundation for International Peace.
China’s views and ideas on Iran’s nuclear proliferation can be understood as (China emphasizes that the current global security situation and its experience of complex and profound changes, the challenges of containing and intensifying proliferation and nuclear security are intensifying, and nuclear terrorism cannot be ignored), it ignores and Ignoring Western powers and the policies of the United States itself runs counter to China's vision.
China’s understanding of responding to the pressure on Iran’s nuclear program by the United States is characterized by Iran’s regional positioning mechanism in the Middle East, making it a regional power, especially after signing the "25-year Strategic Partnership Agreement" with Iran in March 2021. . "As China strengthens its partnership with other major powers, mobilizes and recruits them to exert collective pressure on the United States of America, forcing it to accept Iran’s terms in the negotiations on the nuclear proliferation document and Washington’s concessions in favor of Tehran, especially It is in lifting and relaxing the sanctions imposed on Iran by the United States.
What can be emphasized here is that, given the increasingly fierce competition between the United States and China, this seems to be important (countries in the region focus on narrowing gaps, resolving regional conflicts, rebuilding strategic alliances and security initiatives), which makes the region’s Faced with (all attempts to use it in the context of conflicts between major powers), it becomes a difficult figure to deal with. Countries in the region should also deepen their relations with medium-sized powers and influential countries and partners in the international system, especially with the permanent members of the UN Security Council and the European Union. Its interest in the region and imposes a balanced equation to prevent exposure to the effects of any new cold war that may affect the region due to US policy-China competition).
In my personal opinion, that (the Iranians may have another opportunity to negotiate through the movement to reverse history), what I mean here is (Iran’s performance during the reign of the former President "Muhammad Khatami" and after the United States ) The invasion of Iraq after 2003 was a generous offer made to the West during the well-known (Swiss diplomacy) period when the show was called "The Big Deal").
The so-called (Swiss diplomacy) refers to (Iran’s commitment to be completely transparent about its nuclear documents and to prove that it stops supporting Hamas in Palestine and Hezbollah in Lebanon in exchange for the United States of America’s comprehensive security guarantee and normalization of relations with it), I It is believed that Iran will win the ranks of the international community based on the Swiss diplomacy, including (Israel and the Arab Gulf countries are Iran’s mortal enemies in the Middle East).
China also hopes to adhere to the 2015 negotiations with Iran, which is called the "5+1" group, which includes: (the United States, France, the United Kingdom, Russia, China, and Germany and Iran). However, the unilateral withdrawal of the United States during Trump's term of office in 2018 has created a series of tensions in the media and diplomacy about the reasons for the withdrawal of the United States, and China has continuously questioned (the role of the International Atomic Energy Agency in countering Washington and Washington). Unilaterally withdraw from the nuclear agreement signed by the United States and Iran in 2015).
I can also stop here on a serious issue that is rarely touched. Regarding the (Western, American and even Israeli media’s role in Iran, and mobilizing the world to oppose it, accusing Iran of a few months away from manufacturing) A nuclear weapon, which puts a real pressure on the work of the IAEA). In my personal opinion, Iran’s nuclear program will take a long time to complete, especially considering that the Islamic Republic of Iran is suffering from a severe economic crisis, lacks sufficient financial, technical and psychological resources, and finally decided to have this final form of Nuclear weapons.
China is seeking to reach an agreement on a rigorous and comprehensive framework for Iran’s nuclear program that guarantees (complete and free international control without the United States, Israel, or international pressure on uranium enrichment and plutonium residues), which May prevent any effort to create a nuclear program. Nuclear weapons, according to the assurances of American experts themselves in the files of nuclear technicians.
Here, China has put forward some terms and conditions in advance of the new mechanism (renegotiation of the Iranian nuclear document against the United States of America). They are:
Call on China (to lift the economic sanctions imposed by Europe and the United States on Iran) as a prerequisite for goodwill towards Iran.
China understands the IAEA’s long-term restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program, but China supports (continuation of small-scale, identifiable uranium enrichment for Iran’s peaceful use of nuclear energy in power generation and other legal work), and so on.
China supports efforts to reduce the number of Iranian centrifuges by two-thirds, while retaining the rest and monitoring the nature of their peaceful uses.
China’s monitoring and supervision of these activities (disposing of Iran’s enriched uranium under the supervision of IAEA supervisors without pressure from the United States) may exercise arbitrary charges against Iran against them.
China agrees that Iranians will not export nuclear fuel in the next few years, and supports the strategy of not building Iranian reactors that may be operated on heavy water for dangerous nuclear purposes, and China supports the IAEA’s lack of transfer of Iranian equipment from one country. Tehran’s other A nuclear facility is about 15 years old to ensure integrity and transparency).
Iran allows IAEA inspectors to enter all suspicious locations, including Iranian military locations, but this was done after "consulting with Tehran itself out of respect for its internal affairs and sovereignty."
The necessity of maintenance (an additional 5 years ban on the import of Iranian weapons and a ban on the import of ballistic missiles for 8 years).
China asks the United States and the international community (to release Iran’s frozen assets, estimated to be billions of dollars) to restore the wheels of development and economic growth for the benefit of the Iranian people.
China's request (to lift the ban on Iran Airlines, the Central Bank and Iranian companies).
China calls on the International Atomic Energy Agency to carry out international cooperation with Iran. On the one hand, it can benefit from its advantages in energy and technology, and on the other hand, it can integrate Iran into and gain the favor of the international community. ).
Here, we find China’s desire for (the success of the Iranian nuclear agreement negotiations, as China’s diplomatic success and victory in the face of Washington), which has been proved by China’s previous proposals, including (including a negotiation based on a negotiation framework). Framework) step by step mutual concessions to make it successful, which means Iran’s concession in exchange for the concession of the United States of America and the IAEA negotiator).
China’s long-term vision is embodied in all efforts, suggestions, and solutions to propose and negotiate the Iranian nuclear issue in order to (in the face of US and Western policies, to gain dual international political influence for Beijing as a superpower, and to support China’s appeal International diversification and the existence of a multilateral system that actively participates in it). If this goal is achieved, whether it is at the political or economic level, Beijing will become (the first and largest international beneficiary to complete the Iran nuclear agreement under the conditions that all parties are satisfied), and it will not leave China itself. Any obvious negative effects. future.
At all stages of the negotiation, China has also made unremitting efforts to resolve the differences between Washington and Tehran, especially (encourage Beijing to adhere to the international joint action plan, as proposed by China as a solution to the Iranian nuclear issue), abbreviated as: " JPOA"
The most prominent one for reaching a comprehensive solution (the proposal for formulating China's negotiation framework for Iran) is to formulate China's proposal, based on five points, as follows:
"China's strategy for a comprehensive solution to the Iranian nuclear crisis" is also a four-point proposal based on China's comprehensive solution, the most prominent of which are:
In view of (the Iranian nuclear document has political security features), it is necessary to initiate a political decision with Iran, not just rely on technical solutions.
All international parties must meet and act in the middle of the road to achieve the necessary flexibility. This requires (accepting the solution of all international parties including Iran).
Following the principle of "gradual and orderly progress, mutual benefit", this is the common denominator of all Chinese proposals internationally.
Thinking outside the box to find a comprehensive solution to the Iranian nuclear crisis, this means: reaching a possible (new, innovative, technical and technical) solution as a step to achieve negotiations with Iran.
In the steps to resolve the nuclear crisis with Tehran, the most prominent of these innovative, new and unconventional Chinese solutions is (the solution proposed by China includes the redesign of the core of the "Arak Heavy Water Facility" reactor, which will enable It stays away from nuclear issues, minimizes its consumption and reduces the efficiency and degree of its work). Here, we can notice that Iran’s Arak nuclear facility can produce plutonium, which is a dangerous substance that is usually used to make nuclear bombs. It is used for military purposes. The (Iranian Arak reactor) was a serious obstacle to the progress of negotiations with Iran, until China proposed an innovative solution, which was (the idea of redesigning the Iranian reactor core to make it impossible to produce plutonium for Iran for military use).
China insists on establishing (a mechanism to guarantee the joint responsibility of all parties, especially the group of negotiating countries (5+1), that is, the participating countries negotiate a nuclear agreement with Iran) in accordance with the text of the pre-nuclear agreement signed with Tehran in 2015. China’s invitation is towards the goal of (Iran’s international integration in the field of peaceful nuclear cooperation and the provision of technical and technical assistance to Iran in the field of peaceful nuclear cooperation). Therefore, China will play a leading role in realizing future negotiations with Iran.
According to China’s official vision, (in order to lift sanctions from the United States, the European Union, and the United Nations in exchange for Iran’s long-term restrictions on its nuclear program), the West suspects that its purpose is to make Iran’s nuclear bombs in the long run and China continues to initiate major diplomacy. Offensive to counter all unilateral sanctions imposed by the United States and Europe on Iran.
The Chinese official's assertion was passed (an important report published by the Chinese Communist Party's official newspaper "China People's Daily" confirmed that "the negotiations between the Chinese leadership and Iran have sent a message of hope to Iran"). The world is about the success of China’s diplomatic efforts to resolve the steps.” Chinese newspapers emphasized the results, emphasizing that “the current facts show that dialogue and negotiation are the only correct and effective ways to properly resolve the Iranian nuclear issue. It is unacceptable for a country to threaten to use force and impose unilateral sanctions against Iran.” The Chinese People’s Daily emphasized in concluding its main speech to the international community: seeking a political solution to the Iranian issue, and according to Beijing’s vision and philosophy, The Iran talks have always shown the importance of editing this philosophy."
The current Chinese Foreign Minister (Wang Yi) confirmed that: "China and the United States bear a major responsibility in protecting the international nuclear non-proliferation system and should maintain good contacts in the international nuclear non-proliferation regime. And strive to inject positive energy into the negotiation document with Iran. ".
China is trying (through Chinese supervision to formulate a neutral agreement that satisfies all parties, and through continuous and close coordination between China and related parties, to prove to the International Atomic Energy Agency and the international community that it is capable of persuading Iranians to adopt appropriate solutions), including the United States The United States itself), and China tries to monitor all arrangements and play a constructive role in the process. This is despite the differences between China and the United States on all matters, the first is (the United States signed the AUKUS defense agreement and the four-party agreement to counter China, electronic security differences between the two sides, value disputes in China’s currency, differences in trade, and the United States’ prohibition from China The company's "Huawei" deal introduces the fifth-generation network)...... etc.
The departure of Angela Merkel plunged Germany into uncertainty. Merkel will become the first in history...
The Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) passed in 2017 entered into force on February 22, 2017.
The new disturbing high temperature record in the Arctic is 38 degrees Celsius, or slightly above 100 degrees Fahrenheit,...
Since the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, whether human rights should always be regarded as universal, or...
The United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26) held in Glasgow last month was defined as "reinvigorating multilateralism", which is the highest in the United Nations...
Respect by the de facto authorities of Afghanistan for fundamental rights and freedoms is essential to ensure the stability of the country. The United Nations...
Omicron becomes "may" exist in most countries in the world, if...
5 security advantages of hybrid cloud solutions
Afghan War: Pakistan’s Sacrifice and India’s Design for Hegemony
Sahel countries unite to universalize quality education
The confused superpower: a year after the US election
Russians love their children too
A holistic approach is needed to deal with future shocks in the Caribbean
American Democracy Summit
The white problem in Moscow: the limitations of Turkish-Russian relations and "strategic competition"